Biohealthmatics.com Public Health Informatics Graduate Program at University of Maryland
advertisement
Biohealthmatics Centers
Home
Jobs Search
Career Center
Networking Center
Company Profiles
Knowledge Center
Industry News
Web Directory
Industry Books
Featured Articles

Biohealthmatics.com....linking professionals
advertisement

Join Us

Link To Us





Making Medical Decisions for the Profoundly Mentally Disabled (Basic Bioethics)

by Norman L. Cantor

Publisher: The MIT Press
Publication Date: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Number of Pages: 319
ISBN: 0262033313


Book Summary:
In this book, Norman Cantor analyzes the legal and moral status of people with profound mental disabilities -- those with extreme cognitive impairments that prevent their exercise of medical self-determination. He proposes a legal and moral framework for surrogate medical decision making on their behalf. The issues Cantor explores will be of interest to professionals in law, medicine, psychology, philosophy, and ethics, as well as to parents, guardians, and health care providers who face perplexing issues in the context of surrogate medical decision making.

The profoundly mentally disabled are thought by some moral philosophers to lack the minimum cognitive ability for personhood. Countering this position, Cantor advances both theoretical and practical arguments for according them full legal and moral status . He also argues that the concept of intrinsic human dignity should have an integral role in shaping the bounds of surrogate decision making. Thus, he claims, while profoundly mentally disabled persons are not entitled to make their own medical decisions, respect for intrinsic human dignity dictates their right to have a conscientious surrogate make medical decisions on their behalf. Cantor discusses the criteria that bind such surrogates. He asserts, contrary to popular wisdom, that the best interests of the disabled person are not always the determinative standard: the interests of family or others can sometimes be considered. Surrogates may even, consistent with the intrinsic human dignity standard, sometimes authorize tissue donation or participation in nontherapeutic medical research by profoundly disabled persons. Intrinsic human dignity limits the occasions for such decisions and dictates close attention to the preferences and feelings of the profoundly disabled persons themselves. Cantor also analyzes the underlying philosophical rationale that makes these decision-making criteria consistent with law and morals.


advertisement

Book Reviews

Post a book review for this title

No reviews for this title. Be the first to post a review.

 

More Health Informatics BooksMore Health Informatics Books ...

 
 

 

 

 

   
Copyright © 2010 Biohealthmatics.com. All Rights Reserved. Contact Us - About Us - Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Resources
Can't find what you are looking for? View our Site Map

Also try visiting PaidEmployment.com for more career resources



Proudly supports TDS Platform- An Online e-Health Platform

Last Updated: 24 November 2007.